Is it implicitly wrong to sell breastmilk?

I"ve only been you do a little celebration of the mass on offered breastmilk for additional income and there"s a big piece of me that would loooooove to be a SAHM and sell my breastmilk. My parental leave is roughly up and I unequivocally do not wish to go behind to work. I"d love to be a stay at home mother but we can"t means to do but my income. We could pitch it if I was bringing in income by offered breastmilk and I could be a SAHM mother too!

On the pick hand, something about offered breast divert leaves me feeling.. I don"t know.. unsettled. What right do I have to assign a Aparate Foto list family for my milk? Obviously if a family is shopping breastmilk they unequivocally need it and don"t feel that there is a improved alternative. What kind of a chairman would I be to assign them for bm instead of donating it.

Under what resources would you sell your bm? Do you think it"s implicitly wrong? How does the use of being paid to be a wetnurse cause in to your perspective on the matter?

Actually, I find it most some-more cryptic to BUY breastmilkbut I think that"s sensitive by the story of wetnursing. I don"t see a big difference, implicitly speaking, in between shopping pumped divert and employing a wetnurse. Here"s the complaint that I have with both of those practices If shopping breastmilk becomes widespread, rich family groups will buy it, and poorer women will sell it. If the cost is right, poorer women might finish up in the on all sides of offered the divert that they need to feed their own children.

There have been cases in story when this has happened in 17th century France* where it was usual for rich women to sinecure wetnurses, there were most cases where the babies of poorer women died or were done utterly ill since their mother"s divert went to the rich baby, and the bad baby was feed gruel or a little pick surrogate food.

Of march I commend the incident where a mother has a hulk freezer accumulate and wants to assistance out with a family who can"t helper a baby is a really opposite business in conditions of the energy relations involved, but I think there should be really despotic authorised discipline around this to strengthen less rich mothers and babies, only in case.

*Apologies if I have the time support wrong herethis is described in Sarah Hrdy"s book "Mother Nature," that is sort of a healthy story of mothering practices opposite human enlightenment and history, and I"m describing this from memory.

Hmm, it"s deliberate implicitly fine to sell food, shelter, breastmilk substitutes, blood, medicine, and medicinal services, and when people need those they REALLY need those. Though the supervision mostly helps them with those costs.